diff --git a/Flat-Rate vs Per-Solve CAPTCHA Solving.-.md b/Flat-Rate vs Per-Solve CAPTCHA Solving.-.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2205a0a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Flat-Rate vs Per-Solve CAPTCHA Solving.-.md	
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+A Selenium setup remains a go-to for browser automation, and CapSkip fits right in. Your the WebDriver flow as is and hand off the CAPTCHA to CapSkip when one appears, so the session continues with no manual steps.
+
+Solid documentation and tutorials make onboarding faster. From the setup guide to the API docs and the FAQ, most questions are answered before ever ask, so your team spends effort on building rather than firefighting.
+
+reCAPTCHA v2 remains one of the most common challenges on the web, covering the classic checkbox to silent and callback versions. CapSkip solves each of these on your own machine quickly, which means your automation does not grind to a halt every time one shows up. Because it emulates common solver APIs, wiring it in is painless.
+
+Automated browsers expose fingerprints which detection systems look at, which is why combining solid browser hygiene with dependable CAPTCHA solving counts. CapSkip handles the solving half so your team focus on the browser side.
+
+Used responsibly, CAPTCHA solving supports legitimate use cases like QA, monitoring, and permitted scraping. It is wise respecting each target's terms and relevant law; used that way, a good solver is simply another automation helper.
+
+reCAPTCHA v3 takes a different tack: rather than a clickable challenge, it scores interactions behind the scenes. Getting a usable score takes tooling that understands how v3 behaves, and CapSkip is built to do exactly that, producing tokens in seconds so your flow continues.
+
+A Python codebase developers have a simple path with CapSkip, which emulates the request format of popular solving services. In practice, this means aiming current code at CapSkip with minimal changes - nothing to rebuild.
+
+A major benefits of processing locally is price. Most services bill per solve, so your costs rise as volume grows. CapSkip uses fixed pricing and  [See More](https://wiki-Babylonsignalis.org/index.php/Speed_Counts:_Why_Local_CAPTCHA_Solving_Comes_Out_Ahead) unlimited solves, so scaling does not mean watching the meter.
+
+Not all CAPTCHA tools are built the same. When you evaluate options, it helps to understand what actually counts: supported challenge types, solving speed, pricing, and whether it runs on your own machine.
+
+Proxies is often necessary for serious automation, and CapSkip works with proxies out of the box. You can send traffic however your setup needs while still solving CAPTCHAs on your own machine, so behavior consistent across runs.
+
+Token expiration often catch out automations that fetch ahead of time. The key is simply to grab it right before the moment you use it, and CapSkip returns valid results quickly enough to keep that simple.
+
+Inventory tracking across dozens of sites involves constant hits, and many of those pages guard checkout with CAPTCHAs. Clearing the challenges on your hardware lets the data current without runaway costs.
+
+Teams migrating from 2Captcha often brace for a painful migration. In practice, since CapSkip mirrors the familiar API, the change is largely a matter of endpoints plus keeping everything else the same.
+
+Anyone moving from 2Captcha usually brace for a painful switch. In practice,  [Https://Plingue.com](https://plingue.com/read-blog/4884_selenium-and-captchas-a-clean-approach.html) because CapSkip emulates the familiar API, the move comes down to largely swapping the endpoint plus keeping everything else as it was.
+
+Privacy is a real concern when each challenge gets shipped to a third-party service. Because CapSkip runs locally, no challenge data departs your machine, so sensitive workflows stay on your own systems. If you handle sensitive data, that can be the deciding factor.
+
+Cloudflare performs lightweight checks that aim to separate humans from automation without classic puzzles. Getting past those reliably calls for a purpose-built solver, and CapSkip handles Turnstile on your machine.
+
+Within reason, CAPTCHA solving supports valid work like QA, accessibility, and permitted scraping. Always wise respecting a site's terms and applicable law; used that way, a good solver is simply a productivity tool.
+
+At its core, a CAPTCHA solver interprets a challenge and produces the solution a site is looking for, so an automated script can keep going. The difference with CapSkip is that the work stays on your own Windows machine - no challenge data leaves your hardware, and you avoid per-solve fees. This mix of control and flat pricing turns out to be hard to beat for steady workloads.
+
+Image CAPTCHAs remain everywhere, from login forms to checkout screens. CapSkip solves thousands of image CAPTCHA variants locally, usually almost instantly. This throughput adds up the moment you process high numbers of challenges.
+
+Under the hood, reCAPTCHA v3 assigns a risk score from watched behavior instead of a one checkbox. Producing a good score calls for tooling designed for that approach, which is exactly what CapSkip targets.
+
+Concurrent solving is the point at which self-hosted tooling really shines. Since you have no remote throttle based on your bill, teams can spread jobs across numerous threads and still keep costs fixed.
+
+Under the hood, reCAPTCHA v3 hands out a score from watched behavior instead of a one click. Producing a usable score calls for a solver built for that model, which is exactly what CapSkip is built for.
\ No newline at end of file